Senin, 17 Agustus 2009

The Best Decision You'll Ever Make

Here's a great article that I thought I would pass on...hope you find it interesting! –Kim

Top 10 Reasons to Adopt a Rescue
By Mary and Doug Clark
Labrador Retriever Rescue, Inc.

Why on earth would anyone want to adopt a rescued dog? After all, aren't they like used cars? Who wants someone else's problems? If the dog is so wonderful, why would anyone give him away? If he was a stray, why didn't someone try to find him? I'd rather buy a puppy, so I know what I'm getting – and besides, they're so cute!"

Dog rescues often hear a variation of this conversation. Many prospective dog owners are just not convinced that owning an older (i.e., 6 mo.+) "pre-owned" dog is better than buying a puppy. But there are a number of reasons why adopting a dog from a rescue that carefully screens and evaluates its dogs can provide an even better alternative. Here are the top 10 reasons you should consider a rescue....


10. In a Word – Housebroken
With most family members gone during the work week for 8 hours or more, housetraining a puppy and its small bladder can take awhile. Puppies need a consistent schedule with frequent opportunities to eliminate where you want them to go. They can't wait for the boss to finish his meeting or the kids to come home from after school activities. An older dog can "hold it" much more reliably for longer time periods, and usually the rescue has him housebroken before he is adopted.

9. Intact Underwear
With a "chewy" puppy, you can count on at least 10 mismatched pairs of socks and a variety of unmentionables rendered to the "rag bag" before he cuts every tooth. Also, you can expect holes in your carpet (along with the urine stains), pages missing from books, stuffing exposed from couches, and at least one dead remote control. No matter how well you watch them, it will happen – this is a puppy's job! An older dog can usually have the run of the house without destroying it.

8. A Good Night's Sleep
Forget the alarm clocks and hot water bottles, a puppy can be very demanding at 2am and 4am and 6am. He misses his litter-mates, and that stuffed animal will not make a puppy pile with him. If you have children, you've been there and done that. How about a little peace and quiet? How about an older rescue dog?

7. Finish the Newspaper
With a puppy running amok in your house, do you think you will be able to relax when you get home from work? Do you think your kids will really feed him, clean up the messes, take him for a walk in the pouring rain every hour to get him housetrained? With an adult dog, it will only be the kids running amok, because your dog will be sitting calmly next to you, while your workday stress flows away and your blood pressure lowers as you pet him.

6. Easier Vet Trips
Those puppies need their series of puppy shots and fecals, then their rabies shot, then a trip to be altered, maybe an emergency trip or two if they've chewed something dangerous. Those puppy visits can add up (on top of what you paid for the dog). Your donation to the rescue when adopting an older pup should get you a dog with all shots current, already altered, heartworm negative and on preventative, at the minimum.

5. What You See Is What You Get
How big will that puppy be? What kind of temperament will he have? Will he be easily trained? Will his personality be for what you were hoping? How active will he be? When adopting an older dog from a rescue, all of those questions are easily answered. You can pick large or small, active or couch potato, goofy or brilliant, sweet or sassy. The rescue and its foster homes can guide you to pick the right match. (Our rescue is full of puppies who became the wrong match as they got older!)

4. Unscarred Children (and Adults)
When the puppy isn't teething on your possessions, he will be teething on your children and yourself. Our rescue routinely gets called from panicked parents who are sure their dog is biting the children. Since biting implies hostile intent and would be a consideration whether we accept their give-up, we ask questions and usually find out the dog is being nippy. Parents are often too emotional to see the difference; but a growing puppy is going to put everything from food to clothes to hands in their mouths, and as they get older and bigger it definitely hurts (and will get worse, if they aren't being corrected properly). Most older dogs have "been there, done that, moved on."

3. Matchmaker, Make Me a Match
Puppy love is often no more than an attachment to a look or a color. It is not much of a basis on which to make a decision that will hopefully last 15+ years. While that puppy may have been the cutest of the litter, he may grow up to be superactive (when what you wanted was a couch buddy); she may be a couch princess (when what you wanted was a tireless hiking companion); he may want to spend every waking moment in the water (while you're a landlubber); or she may want to be an only child (while you are intending to have kids or more animals). Pet mis-matches are one of the top reasons rescues get give-up phone calls. Good rescues do extensive evaluating of both their dogs and their applicants to be sure that both dog and family will be happy with each other until death do them part.

2. Instant Companion
With an older dog, you automatically have a buddy that can go everywhere and do everything with you NOW. There's no waiting for a puppy to grow up (and then hope he will like to do what you enjoy). You will have been able to select the most compatible dog: one that travels well, one that loves to play with your friends' dogs, one with excellent house manners that you can take to your parents' new home with the new carpet and the new couch. You can come home after a long day's work and spend your time on a relaxing walk, ride or swim with your new best friend (rather than cleaning up after a small puppy).

1. Bond, Dog, Bond
Dogs who have been uprooted from their happy homes or have not had the best start in life are more likely to bond very completely and deeply with their new people. Those who have lost their families through death, divorce or lifestyle change go through a terrible mourning process. But, once attached to a new loving family, they seem to want to please as much as possible to make sure they are never homeless again. Those dogs that are just learning about the good life and good people seem to bond even deeper. They know what life on the streets, life on the end of a chain, or worse, is all about, and they revel and blossom in a nurturing, loving environment. Most rescue dogs make exceptionally affectionate and attentive pets and extremely loyal companions.


Unfortunately, many folks think dogs that end up in rescue are all genetically and behaviorally inferior. But, it is not uncommon for us to get $500-$1,000 dogs that have either outlived their usefulness or their novelty with impulsive owners who considered their dog a possession rather than a friend or member of the family, or simply did not really consider the time, effort and expense needed to be a dog owner.

Not all breeders will accept "returns," so choices for giving up dogs can be limited to animal welfare organizations, such as rescues, or the owners trying to place their own dogs. Good rescues will evaluate the dog before accepting him/her (medically, behaviorally and for breed confirmation), rehabilitate, if necessary, and adopt the animal only when he/she is ready and to a home that matches and is realistic about the commitment necessary to provide the dog with the best home possible.

Choosing a rescue dog over a purchased pup will not immediately solve the pet overpopulation problem (only responsible pet owners and breeders can do that), but it does give many of them a chance they otherwise would not have. But, beyond doing a "good deed," adopting a rescue dog can be the best decision and addition to the family you ever made.

Source: http://www.lrr.org/wiki/page/ReadingRoom/Why+Adopt
Copyright © 2009 Labrador Retriever Rescue, Inc.


See the List of No-kill Shelters and Rescues at the bottom of this page.

Also, see:

Jumat, 14 Agustus 2009

Vick Seeks Redemption with Eagles

Quarterback Admits 'Mistakes' with Dogfighting Ring

By Tim Lemke
August 15, 2009

Less than a month after being released from federal custody, Michael Vick sat alongside Philadelphia Eagles coach Andy Reid on Friday and thanked him for a second chance.

The former Pro Bowl quarterback, who spent six years with the Atlanta Falcons and nearly two years in prison after pleading guilty to financing an illegal dogfighting ring, issued his first public apology since the end of his incarceration. And he expressed gratitude to the Eagles for signing him to a contract that could pay him more than $7 million over the next two years.

"I know I made some mistakes and have done some terrible things," Vick said. "Now I want to be part of the solution and not part of the problem. I'm just glad I have an opportunity."

For Vick, the signing could mean the resumption of a once-illustrious career during which he emerged as one of the most athletic and versatile players in the National Football League.

Vick also at one point was the league's highest-paid player, but he reportedly will be paid $1.5 million this year – barely more than the league veteran minimum. The team holds a $5 million option for 2010. The deal could be worth nearly $10 million if he meets a series of incentives.

"I think we know Michael Vick two years ago was one of the greatest quarterbacks in the National Football League," Reid said. "I've always said to the people of Philadelphia that I would try to bring in the best players that can help our players achieve that highest goal, and that's the Super Bowl."

Reid said he understood that some fans would be upset with the team's decision to sign Vick, who as part of his plea agreement admitted to watching dogfights and participating in executions of the animals. Even Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie, a passionate dog owner, called the decision "soul-searching."

"I know some people will not agree," Reid said. "But on the other hand, I think the majority will, and fortunately in this country if we handle ourselves the proper way we're given the opportunity for second chances. People understand that."

Though Vick will earn a fraction of his former salary, every dollar of income will help: He currently is bankrupt. He is scheduled to present a plan to a judge later this month for the payment of creditors. At least three efforts to approve the plan were rejected because Vick had no major source of income.

Sentiment in Philadelphia, of course, might be driven by how well Vick plays. Sports fans in the city are notoriously supportive of players who succeed – and notoriously hard on those who flop.

It still is unclear how Vick would be used on the field by the Eagles – the team says incumbent Donovan McNabb remains the starting quarterback. In fact, Reid said, McNabb openly lobbied the team to sign Vick.

"Michael will contribute," Reid said. "I'm not going to sit here and tell you how he's going to contribute, because I'm not [so] naive to think the rest of the National Football League is not watching this, and I have to play those guys. But I will say that he will contribute, and then you can ask defensive coordinators on other teams if they're worried about that."

Vick's skills as a pure passer often were questioned during his time with the Falcons, but he was praised for his ability to run with the football.

Reporters on Friday asked Vick whether he would be willing to appear in special formations that allow for two quarterbacks and give a player the option to run or pass. Several teams last season, including the Eagles, used such formations, which are often referred to as the "Wildcat."

"Whatever coach Reid signs off, that's what I'll do," Vick said. "I'm just ready to contribute and help with a Super Bowl."

Opposing coaches said they expect the addition of Vick will make it more challenging to prepare for games against the Eagles. The Washington Redskins could face Vick twice, at FedEx Field on Oct. 26 and in Philadelphia on Nov. 29.

"He's going to be very difficult [to defend]," Redskins coach Jim Zorn said. "It will be interesting how he works into the Eagles. Unfortunately, he's in our division. He's been out for a couple of years, but a guy like that, he's going to be so fired up."

The Eagles could be without Vick's services for the first five weeks of the season under the terms of a conditional reinstatement by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell.

Vick can participate in the Eagles' final two preseason games and work out with the team, but he would not be eligible to play until Oct. 18, when the Eagles face the Oakland Raiders on the road.

Vick's reinstatement requires him to remain out of trouble and work with animal welfare groups to speak out against animal cruelty. Mr. Goodell also asked former Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy to advise Vick formally during his transition back into society and the NFL. Dungy had been counseling Vick informally during his time in prison.

"I'm proud of the Eagles," said Dungy, who sat next to Vick at Friday's announcement. "I know they didn't do this as a charity measure. They feel like Mike's going to help their football team and be a weapon for them. But they also stepped out to give a man a second chance."

Vick has not played football since Dec. 31, 2006, when the Falcons lost to the Eagles in the final game of the regular season. In April 2007, federal prosecutors accused Vick of financing a large dogfighting ring and using his property in Surry County, Va., to hold illegal fights between dogs. According to prosecutors, many of the dogs involved in the ring were beaten or killed by Vick and his associates. Vick accepted a plea agreement in August of that year.

Shortly after being released from federal custody last month, Vick met with Mr. Goodell, who had suspended him indefinitely in 2007.

Vick on Friday apologized several times, acknowledging an error for once rationalizing dogfighting as a common and acceptable part of the culture of the South.

"For the life of me today, I can't understand why I was involved in such pointless activity," he said.

Convincing animal-welfare supporters of his rehabilitation may not be so easy.

Source: http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/15/reformed-vick-seeks-redemption-with-eagles/
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC



Also, see:


How Well is Your Dog Groomed?

Here's a great article that I thought I would pass on...hope you find it interesting! –Kim

How to Groom Your Dog at Home

The reason one should groom his/her dog is simple – your dog's physical state influences the way he feels and the way you look at your dog. Extreme cases, where lack of proper care, cleaning and grooming can directly affect the behavior of your dog, are not rare.

Proper grooming not only infuses a healthy glow to your dog's appearance, but also helps develop his self-esteem; while it makes you a very proud parent, when you show off your dog to others.

The first step involved in dog grooming is: Brushing!

Brushing has been universally acknowledged by expert dog groomers as the single most important step in grooming.

The benefits of brushing are many. To name a few:

  • Better blood circulation
  • Shinier and healthier coat
  • Better bonding

Even if you know how crucial brushing is for your dog's health and well-being, we all know that there is a right way and a wrong way of doing anything. And without doubt, you would like to do everything the RIGHT way when it comes to your dog.

Yes, there's a method to follow while brushing your dog.

Here are FIVE steps to successfully brushing your dog that will prove to be extremely useful:

  • Brush against the growth of the hair first with a slicker brush and then with a medium or wide-toothed comb.
  • The slicker brush removes all the loose hair and the comb takes care of the tangles.
  • Brush your dog along the hair growth and make sure you reach the skin as you brush his way.
  • Then use a flea comb over the coat to get the fleas and remove any remaining tangles. Part the coat and start from the root and then comb through.
  • If your dog's paw pads are hairy, then clip them using electric clippers. Do not clip the hair in between the pads. Clip only the excess hair.

Brush your dog's hairs to prevent it from matting. Matting can be a very painful experience.

Regular brushing untangles the matted hairs on your dog's coat. Since this is a risky job to do, the best way out is to prevent them from forming in the first place. And doing this is simple: just brush and comb your dog regularly. If and when you see any mats or tangles, use a detangle solution and a medium-toothed comb.

Don't wait until your dog is dirty or matted to introduce him to grooming. That would make him associate the experience with unpleasantness. Moreover, many dogs learn to see their routine brushing as an alternate form of petting, i.e. another source of affection and attention.

Subscribe to this FREE dog grooming mini course and start grooming your dog all by yourself right from the comfort of your home, today.

Copyright © 2009 TrainPetDog.com

Kamis, 13 Agustus 2009

"Ethical Treatment" of Animals???

Here's some important information I want to pass on. –Kim

PETA: "The Most Successful Radical Organization in America"

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has been described as "by far the most successful radical organization in America." The key word is radical.
PETA seeks "total animal liberation," according to its president and co-founder, Ingrid Newkirk. That means no meat or dairy, of course; but it also means no aquariums, no circuses, no hunting or fishing, no fur or leather and no medical research using animals. PETA is even opposed to the use of seeing-eye dogs.
Amidst the dozens of animal rights organizations, PETA occupies the niche of – in Newkirk's own words – "complete press sluts." Endlessly seeking media exposure, PETA sends out dozens of press releases every week.

PETA Caught in the Act
The crimes and tactics
In the past, PETA has handled the press for the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), a violent, underground group of fanatics who plant firebombs in restaurants, destroy butcher shops and torch research labs. The FBI considers ALF among America's most active and prolific terrorist groups, but PETA compares it to the Underground Railroad and the French Resistance. More than 20 years after its inception, PETA continues to hire convicted ALF militants and funds their legal defense. In at least one case, court records show that Ingrid Newkirk herself was involved in an ALF arson.
PETA has even begun to adopt the tactics of an ALF offshoot known as SHAC (Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty). This group is notorious for taking protests outside the boardroom and into the living room, attacking their targets at their homes.
In 2001, three masked SHAC members brutally bludgeoned a medical researcher outside his home in England. The lead attacker was arrested and sentenced to three years in prison. A few months later, SHAC attacked another research industry employee on his doorstep with a chemical spray to his eyes, leaving him temporarily blinded and writhing in pain. The following year, Newkirk was asked her opinion of SHAC in the Boston Herald. Her response? "More power to SHAC if they can get someone's attention."
By 2003, PETA activists had adopted SHAC's protest techniques, stalking and harassing fast-food restaurant executives. Not content to write letters and picket the chain restaurant's offices, PETA's leaders met with the CEO's pastor, and visited his country club and the manager of one of his favorite restaurants. PETA activists, one dressed in a chicken suit, even protested at the church of two executives, annoying worshipers by driving a truck with giant screens of slaughterhouse video back and forth along the street.
In an effort to win more media exposure, PETA has adopted the counter-intuitive tactic of buying stock in restaurant and food companies that serve and sell meat. After buying just enough shares to qualify, PETA's pattern is to introduce shareholder resolutions that would require animal-rights-oriented practices in the way animals are handled and slaughtered.
PETA's goal as a shareholder, of course, is not to turn a profit. Its resolutions, if passed, would increase the cost of doing business and lower the value of everyone's investment. The group has claimed that it's "not trying to remove meat from the menu." But with a stated long-term goal of "total animal liberation," pushing for animal-welfare changes is just a first step. PETA's short-term goals are to economically cripple these companies, force them to increase the retail price of meat and nudge consumers toward eating less of it.
PETA collected almost $29 million in donations in 2004 alone, but few donors understand exactly where their money is going. During the past ten years, PETA has spent four times as much on criminals and their legal defense than it has on shelters, spay-neuter programs and other efforts that actually help animals.

The Top Ten Transgressions
From both a moral and a legal standpoint, there are far too many objectionable things about PETA to list here in detail. But the following "top ten list" is a good start:
  • PETA is not an animal welfare organization.
    PETA spends less than one percent of its multi-million dollar budget actually helping animals. The group euthanized (killed) more than 1,900 animals in 2003 alone – that's over 85% of the animals it received. In fact, from July 1998 through the end of 2003, PETA killed over 10,000 dogs, cats and other "companion animals" at its Norfolk, Virginia headquarters. That's more than five animals every day. On its 2002 federal income-tax return, PETA claimed a $9,370 expense for a giant walk-in freezer, the kind most people use as a meat locker or for ice-cream storage. But animal-rights activists don't eat meat or dairy foods. So far, the group hasn't confirmed the obvious – that it's using the appliance to store the bodies of its victims.
  • PETA assaults common decency.
    PETA's leadership has compared animal farmers to serial killer (and cannibal) Jeffrey Dahmer. They proclaimed in a 2003 exhibit that chickens are as valuable as Jewish Holocaust victims. They announced with a 2001 billboard that a shark attack on a little boy was "revenge" against humans who had it coming anyway. They have branded parents who feed their kids meat and milk: "child abusers." In 2002, PETA organized a campaign to sabotage a popular Thanksgiving hotline, which provides free advice about cooking turkeys. The group has even contemplated (literally) dancing on the grave of Kentucky Fried Chicken's Colonel Sanders. And in 2003, PETA president Ingrid Newkirk wrote to Yasser Arafat, pleading with him to make certain no animals are harmed in Palestinian suicide-bombing attacks.
  • PETA peddles its "animal liberation" food agenda through a medical front group that pretends to offer objective nutritional advice.
    A group misleadingly named the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) has duped the press into believing that it is an association of conscientious doctors promoting good nutrition. In fact, it is a PETA front group. PCRM and PETA share money, offices and staff. The American Medical Association calls PCRM a "pseudo-physicians group," has demanded that PCRM stop its "inappropriate and unethical tactics used to manipulate public opinion," and argues that PCRM has been "blatantly misleading Americans" and "concealing its true purpose as an animal 'rights' organization." Taking a page out of PETA's press book, PCRM has labeled U.S. school lunches "weapons of mass destruction" because they include meat and milk. PCRM's president, a psychiatrist named Neal Barnard, recently duped Newsweek into covering his "study" (of seven people) supposedly demonstrating that a vegan diet helped prevent type-2 diabetes. In 2002, PCRM was cited in major newspapers more than 550 times. It was identified as an animal-rights organization in only a handful of those cases.
  • PETA exploits sick people.
    PETA famously suggested that drinking milk causes cancer, in an advertisement mocking then-NYC Mayor Rudy Guliani with the words "Got Prostate Cancer?" In 2003, the group held a demonstration in front of a Toronto-area hospital that was under a SARS-related quarantine, spuriously alleging that animal husbandry has something to do with the epidemic's spread. Upon hearing that Charlton Heston had fallen ill with Alzheimer's Disease, Ingrid Newkirk suggested that PETA would "toy with the idea that both Alzheimer's and CJD [Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease] are related to meat consumption." According to a profile in The New Yorker, she considered "renting billboards that would display a large picture of a gaunt Charlton Heston foaming at the mouth."
  • PETA propagandizes children.
    PETA's Web site for kids puts a skull and crossbones next to the logo of Disney's Animal Kingdom and tells the horror story of a fast food restaurant employee who "had taken a patty into the potty with her, then returned and said she had peed on it." It hands out trading cards to kids that allege drinking milk will make them fat, pimply, flatulent and phlegm-ridden. PETA also has a child-themed Web site and a kiddie-oriented magazine called GRRR! Kids Bite Back. The name is significant, as it is intended to prep children to identify with the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), which has long-used the phrase "bite back" in its promotional materials. In fact, as early as 1991, convicted ALF arsonist and PETA grantee Rodney Coronado was calling his own crime spree "Operation Bite Back." PETA also sends "humane education lecturer" Gary Yourofsky into high schools – and even middle schools – to promote the "animal liberation" agenda. Yourofsky is a convicted ALF criminal who has said he would support burning down medical research labs even if humans were trapped in the flames.
  • PETA distorts religious teachings.
    Not only does PETA oppose the age-old Jewish tradition of Kosher slaughter, but the group's leaders maintain that Jews have misinterpreted their own sacred texts on the subject. They also claim, ignoring mountains of scripture to the contrary, that Jesus was a vegetarian. PETA celebrated Easter in 2003 with a billboard depicting a pig, reading "he died for your sins." PETA also insists (again, selectively ignoring contradictory evidence) that Muhammad "was not a meat-eater." In his speeches to adolescents, Gary Yourofsky regularly compares himself to Gandhi and Jesus Christ. PETA's in-school presentations include the application of "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" to birds and turtles – not people.
  • PETA opposes life-saving medical research.
    PETA has repeatedly attacked groups like the March of Dimes, the Pediatric AIDS Foundation and the American Cancer Society, for conducting animal testing to find cures for birth defects and life-threatening diseases. When asked if she would oppose an experiment on five thousand rats if it would result in a cure for AIDS, Newkirk responded: "Would you be opposed to experiments on your daughter if you knew it would save fifty million people?" In addition to opposing any and all medical research that uses animals, PETA also insults medical professionals by arguing, with a straight face, that animal testing is a counterproductive means of finding cures for human diseases.
  • PETA devalues human life.
    PETA's efforts to treasure every mosquito and cockroach invariably led them to hate human beings for using bug spray and RAID. [Editor's note: When President Obama recently swatted a pesky house fly that was buzzing him in mid-interview during a taping with CNBC, PETA reacted, calling it an "execution," and wants the commander-in-chief to show a little more compassion to even "the least sympathetic animals."] Ingrid Newkirk argues that as human beings, "we're the biggest blight on the face of the earth."
  • PETA openly supports violence and terrorist activity.
    PETA has long-standing ties to militant groups like the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF). The FBI calls these criminal groups a "serious domestic terrorist threat."
Ingrid Newkirk
Motivation
According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, human beings are just another animal species, no more special or important than a snail darter or dairy cow. The group believes, as one commentator put it, that "animal trainers, hunters, fishermen, cattlemen, grocers and indeed all non-vegetarians are the moral equivalent of cannibals, slave-owners and death-camp guards." Newkirk insists that the world would be a better place without people: "Humans have grown like a cancer. We're the biggest blight on the face of the earth."
While valuing livestock over people may be an indefensible argument, it's typical of PETA's overall strategy: to stake out extreme, ridiculous, offensive and often laughable positions, in order to constantly redefine the edge of what's considered "acceptable" philosophy and protest activity. Ten years ago, throwing fake blood on a fur coat, agitating for vegan cafeteria food, or objecting to Biology-class dissection were unusual behaviors. Today, these are commonplace – the radical line is now defined by firebombs, grand theft, stalking of scientists and bloody physical assaults. For this, PETA deserves much of the blame; its habit of upping the ante of bad taste and shock value has redefined misanthropy and bad taste.
For instance, when PETA learned that the photographs of Holocaust victims displayed in its roving exhibit – entitled "The Holocaust on Your Plate" – included Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel as a young man at the Buchenwald concentration camp, it shrugged. "Six million people died in concentration camps," laments Ingrid Newkirk, "but six billion broiler chickens will die this year in slaughterhouses."
When terrorists struck on September 11, 2001, PETA issued a press release emphasizing the "animals left orphaned" and the dogs and cats in nearby buildings who would be "highly traumatized." The press release berated Mayor Giuliani for his "poor record when it comes to animals" and urged him expend time, energy and human resources "to set up a task force to locate and rescue animals" at Ground Zero.
When Newkirk heard that Palestinian militants had strapped explosives to a donkey in the hopes of exploding it in a crowded Jerusalem street, she faxed a letter to Yasser Arafat, pleading with him to "leave the animals out of it."
When a grisly killing spree in Vancouver left 15 women dead, PETA tried to purchase full-page ads in local papers suggesting that this carnage was no worse than the killing of animals for food.
When Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh decided to refrain from eating meat during his last meal, PETA's Bruce Friedrich told reporters: "Mr. McVeigh's decision to go vegetarian groups him with some of the world's greatest visionaries, including Albert Schweitzer, Mohandas Gandhi, Leo Tolstoy and Albert Einstein."
And when images of American POWs brutalized by Saddam's regime came back from the war zone – reminding us of mankind's capacity for barbarism – PETA loudly fretted that the hens used by the army to detect chemical weapons "never enlisted" and that the dolphins locating deadly mines in the Persian Gulf "have not volunteered."
Having proclaimed the life of a roaster chicken to be as valuable as that of a person trapped inside a collapsing skyscraper or imprisoned in a death camp, a murder victim, a federal worker in Oklahoma City, or an innocent Israeli civilian, PETA continues to place greater value on a dolphin than on a ship packed with American soldiers. "I don't believe that people have the right to life," Newkirk has said. "That's a supremacist perversion. A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy."
In this sense, Timothy McVeigh and Osama bin Laden may be seen as heroes to PETA. By taking thousands of humans out of the food chain, they saved far more chickens and cows than they killed people.

Black eye
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals provides aid and comfort for the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) and the Animal Liberation Front (ALF). The two groups are responsible for more than 600 crimes since 1996, causing (by a very conservative FBI estimate) more than $43 million in damage. ALF's "press office" brags that, in 2002, the two groups committed "100 illegal direct actions" – like blowing up SUVs, destroying the brakes on seafood delivery trucks and planting firebombs in restaurants.
The FBI calls ALF and ELF the nation's "most serious domestic terrorism threat." Bruce Friedrich, PETA's "vegan campaign director" and third-in-command, didn't seem to care when he addressed the Animal Rights 2001 convention in Virginia, telling a crowd of over 1,000 activists that "blowing stuff up and smashing windows" is "a great way to bring about animal liberation."
"It would be great," he added, "if all the fast-food outlets, slaughterhouses, these laboratories and the banks who fund them exploded tomorrow."
PETA's connections to ALF and ELF are indisputable. "We did it, we did it. We gave $1,500 to the ELF for a specific program," PETA's Lisa Lange admitted on the Fox News Channel. PETA has offered no fewer than eight different explanations of what the "specific program" was, but law enforcement leaders have noted that since the Earth Liberation Front is a criminal enterprise, it has absolutely no legal "programs" of any kind.
For instance, in 2003, ELF set fire to an unfinished, 200 unit condominium complex near San Diego. The arson caused $50 million in damage, and according to a San Diego Fire Captain: "It could have killed someone." ELF left its calling card in the form of a twelve foot sign that read: "If you build it – we will burn it – the ELF's are mad."
PETA also has given $2,000 to David Wilson, then a national ALF "spokesperson." The group paid $27,000 for the legal defense of Roger Troen, who was arrested for taking part in an October 1986 burglary and arson at the University of Oregon. It gave $7,500 to Fran Stephanie Trutt, who tried to murder the president of a medical laboratory. It gave $5,000 to Josh Harper, who attacked American Indians on a whale hunt by throwing smoke bombs, shooting flares and spraying their faces with chemical fire extinguishers. All of these monies were paid out of tax-exempt funds, the same pot of money constantly enlarged by donations from an unsuspecting general public.
PETA president Ingrid Newkirk is also an acknowledged financial supporter of a publication called No Compromise. This periodical operates on behalf of the radicals of ALF, and often publishes underground "communiqués" and calls to arms from ALF leaders.
Most ominously, PETA president Ingrid Newkirk was involved in the multi-million-dollar arson at Michigan State University that resulted in a 57-month prison term for Animal Liberation Front bomber Rodney Coronado. At Coronado's sentencing hearing, U.S. Attorney Michael Dettmer said that PETA's Ingrid Newkirk arranged ahead of time to have Coronado send her a pair of FedEx packages from Michigan – one on the day before he burned the lab down and the other shortly afterward.
The first FedEx, according to the Sentencing Memorandum, was delivered to a woman named Maria Blanton, "a longtime PETA member who had agreed to accept the first Federal Express package from Coronado after being asked to do so by Ingrid Newkirk." The FBI intercepted the second package, which had been sent to the same address. It contained documents that Coronado stole before lighting his firebombs, as well as "a videotape of the perpetrator of the MSU crime, disguised in a ski mask." Since Coronado was convicted of the arson, we now know that he himself was that masked man. "Significantly," wrote U.S. Attorney Dettmer, "Newkirk had arranged to have the package[s] delivered to her days before the MSU arson occurred" (emphasis in the original).
A search warrant executed at Blanton's home turned up evidence that PETA's other co-founder, Alex Pacheco, had also been planning burglaries and break-ins along with Rodney Coronado. The feds seized "surveillance logs; code names for Coronado, Pacheco and others; burglary tools; two-way radios; night vision goggles; [and] phony identification for Coronado and Pacheco."
Shortly after Coronado's arrest, PETA gave $45,200 to his "support committee" and "loaned" $25,000 to his father (the loan was never repaid and PETA hasn't complained). Now free from jail, with an expired parole, and with the benefit of an expired Statute of Limitations on his many earlier arsons (to which he readily confesses in his standard stump speech), Coronado stood before a crowd of hundreds of young people at American University in January 2003 and demonstrated how to turn a milk jug into a bomb. A few days later, ALF criminals tried to burn down a McDonald's restaurant in Chico, California, using a firebomb that matched Coronado's recipe.
The following month, Ingrid Newkirk told ABC News that Rodney Coronado is "a fine young man."
Newkirk wrote a book called Free the Animals! The Untold Story of the U.S. Animal Liberation Front and Its Founder, 'Valerie.' In it she writes: "The ALF has, over the years, trusted People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) to receive copies of the evidence of wrongdoing … I have also become somewhat used to jumping on a plane with copies of freshly purloined documents and hurriedly calling news conferences to discuss the ALF's findings." Indeed, PETA has held such press conferences just hours after ALF arsons and other break-ins.
PETA has published a leaflet called "Animal Liberation Front: the Army of the Kind." In another pamphlet, "Activism and the Law," PETA openly offers advice on "burning a laboratory building."
"I will be the last person to condemn ALF," says Newkirk. And in another interview: "I find it small wonder that the laboratories aren't all burning to the ground. If I had more guts, I'd light a match." In ALF's publication Bite Back (yes, this terrorist group has a newsletter), Newkirk has said: "You can't have all politeness and patience, all potlucks and epistles … Some people will never budge unless [they are] pushed to budge."


SOURCE LIBRARY AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
    Click here to learn about PETA's hypocritical practice of killing thousands of animals.
      Source: http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/21
      Copyright © 2009 Center for Consumer Freedom



      More information about PETA:

      How to Train Your Dog at Home

      Valuable Resource...

      How to Easily Train Your Dog...
      Like a Pro

      It's essential for dog parents like you to know certain basic factors that determine your relationship with your dog and can go a long way in training him effectively.

      Before you begin training your dog, it is absolutely essential that you build a loving bond with him. This is important as it helps you to understand his needs and instincts and also allows your dog to have complete trust in you.

      Let's see how.......

      How To Bond With Your Dog

      Building a bond with your dog is the first and the most crucial step involved in training him successfully. As soon as you bring your dog home, you must first try to develop a caring and loving relationship with him in order to win his trust and confidence.

      When dogs are secure in the knowledge that they belong to the family, they are more likely to respond better to their owners' training commands. Just like with any relationship, there must be mutual trust and respect between you and your dog.

      Trust takes time to develop and respect comes from defining boundaries and treating any breach of those boundaries with firmness and fairness.

      Without enforceable limitations, respect can’t be developed. And when there is no respect, building a bond with your dog is almost impossible.

      Four Golden Rules to Building a Relationship with Your Dog:

      • Spend quality time together;
      • Take him out in the world and experience life together;
      • Establish and promote a level of mutual respect; and
      • Develop a way of communicating to understand each other's needs.

      Building a bond with your dog will not only help you manage him better but will also make your dog calm, quiet and an extremely well-adjusted pet.

      Love your dog and he will love you back!

      When you're successful in building a bond with your dog, you can rest assured that training him and teaching him new and clever tricks will be a cakewalk.

      Learn how to bond with your dog with this free mini course.

      How Your Dog Learns...

      Your dog's learning period can be divided into five phases:

      The Teaching Phase – This is the phase where you must physically demonstrate to your Dog exactly what you want him to do.

      The Practicing Phase – Practice makes Perfect. When a lesson is learned, practice with your dog what you have just taught him.

      The Generalizing Phase – Here you must continue practicing with your dog in different locations and in an environment with a few distractions. You can take your dog out for a walk, or to a nearby park and command him to practice whatever you've taught him.

      Practicing the learned lessons in multiple locations and in the presence of small distractions will help him learn and retain lessons better.

      The Testing Phase – As soon as you're sure that your dog has achieved almost 90% success – he responds correctly almost every time you give a command – you must start testing his accuracy in newer locations with a lot of distractions.

      Example: Take him to the local shopping mall and ask him to obey your command. He may not come up with the correct response the very first time you do this, but you must not lose hope.

      The idea is to test your dog to see how he responds in an environment that is new to him. Set-up a situation where you are in control of the environment and your dog.

      There are only 2 possibilities:

      • Your dog succeeds!!! (Trumpets please!)
      • In case your dog fails, re-examine the situation. Review and/or change your training. Then, try testing again.

      Keep on testing until he succeeds. Follow the rule of the three Ps: patience, persistence, praise.

      Internalizing Phase Finally, comes the extremely rewarding phase where your dog does everything he is taught to do even without your commands.

      Remember:

      • Never scold your dog if he fails. It's not his fault. You have failed as a trainer!
      • You must be patient and persistent for your efforts to show rewards.
      • Appreciate and praise your dog when he does it right! A little encouragement will work wonders for your dog.
      • Dog Training is easy when you do it right.

      Continued - Learn how to train your dog better with this free mini course.

      Copyright © 2009 TrainPetDog.com

      Selasa, 11 Agustus 2009

      Dog-proofing Your Home

      Here's a great article that I thought I would pass on...hope you find it interesting! –Kim

      Protecting Your Canine Companion

      You may think your home is perfectly safe, but it may not be – especially, when viewed by your dog. To your dog, the cleaning products in your cupboard may be especially interesting. And although they are stored in a cupboard, your dog may not find them very difficult to access. Most dogs are very adept at using their paws and muzzle to nudge things like cupboard doors open. Child-proof locks are a good idea for keeping household items that may be dangerous to your dog safely out of his reach.

      If you get a second dog, don't assume that, because your first dog isn't curious about the floor wax, your new dog will follow suit. In fact, your new dog is likely to be interested in everything in your home, because it's all new to her. Take a tour through your home, looking at each room through a dog's eye view. The following article will give you an idea of what items to address.

      Garbage receptacle

      Make sure that your garbage receptacle has a tight fitting lid. Most dogs love to nose around in garbage when they have the opportunity, and items such as candy wrappers and chicken bones can be choking hazards. Chocolate can be poisonous to your dog, and food that has spoiled can make him very ill.

      Electrical cords

      Chewing behavior is common to most dogs and cords can be very appealing. Cords should be coiled and tucked away, even if this means rearranging your furniture. A bit of careful thought about how to keep cords safely unavailable to your dog's teeth may prevent her from being electrocuted.

      Cleaning supplies, disinfectants, shampoos and perfumes

      These items may smell and, even, taste great to your dog, but they should be kept safely out of his reach, as they can make him very ill. Household cleaning supplies should be kept in a high cupboard that your dog can't reach, or in a cupboard protected by a child-proof lock. Shampoos shouldn't sit on the side of your tub where your dog might easily reach them. Instead, use a shower caddy or a high cupboard or shelf to keep them away from curious canines.

      Jewelry and loose change

      Jewelry is often of the right size to be easily swallowed by most dogs, and is dangerous to your dog, as she may choke on it. The same goes for loose change that is left lying about. Some coins – for example, pennies – contain zinc which can cause vomiting, anemia or even death if ingested by your dog.

      Garbage bags and nylons

      Garbage bags can be very tempting to most dogs, but they are dangerous, because it's easy for your dog to get tangled up in them, and this could lead to suffocation. Nylons are also very tempting toys and can obstruct your dog's intestine if swallowed.

      Plants

      Many plants are toxic in live or dried form. Ask your nursery for a complete reference on plants you want to purchase. When in doubt, keep the plants well out of your dog's reach.

      Nails, screws, needles

      These are small, easily overlooked objects in your home that are easily swallowed and very dangerous to your dog.

      Medication

      If your dog swallows your medication, he will usually become ill. Ibuprofen can cause kidney damage or gastric ulcers in dogs. To keep your dog safe, medication should never be within his reach.

      The best rule of thumb when dog-proofing your home is to follow the same steps you would if you were child-proofing your home. Take a careful walk through each room and place any items that could harm your dog safely out of her reach.

      Source: http://www.pedigree.com/02All-Things-Dog/Article-Library/fetch.aspx?artId=60&catId=3&sCatId=14&catName=Adult&sCatName=First%20Aid%20and%20Safety
      © 2009 Mars, Incorporated and its Affiliates

      Minggu, 09 Agustus 2009

      Don't Get Bugged by Ringworm

      Here's a great article that I thought I would pass on...hope you find it interesting! –Kim

      Get the Facts about Tinea (Ringworm)

      Ringworm is probably one of the most misunderstood skin conditions – starting with the misconception that it is caused by an actual worm. Understood or not however, ringworm is out there, and it's more common than you think.

      Since ringworm can affect both people and pets, North Shore Animal League America would like to spread a little light on this confusing and misinterpreted ailment.

      What is Ringworm?

      Ringworm, or its technical name, tinea, is a severely infectious, superficial skin condition caused by fungi called dermatophytes, which can get into the skin and live off of dead skin tissue. Ringworm usually causes an itchy rash. It is typically characterized by a red ring of small blisters or a red ring of scaly skin, hence giving it its name; however, sometimes it may just appear as a red blotch. As the infection grows, the ring will spread, and it can be quite difficult to contain and cure. On animals and on the scalp, ringworm is accompanied by circular pattern hair loss as well.

      Ringworm is highly contagious and spreads through skin-to-skin contact. It can be given from person to person, pet to person, person to pet, pet to pet and can even be spread from place to place on one's own body. It's important to note that the young, elderly and immune-compromised are at a greater risk of contracting ringworm from their pets. Ringworm can also be spread from object to person – towels, hats, clothing and even combs and brushes can easily transmit the infection.

      Ringworm Diagnosis and Treatment

      Some textbook cases of Ringworm can be diagnosed visually. But some may need a diagnostic process including ultraviolet lights and skin cultures. For people, Ringworm can usually be treated at home with a topical, over-the-counter cream, however stubborn cases and those infected with bacteria may need prescribed antibiotics.In pets, ringworm can be more difficult to detect. They will likely experience hair loss and itchiness in the infected areas, which may or may not manifest in a circular pattern.

      Topical shampoos are usually used to treat the skin and the hairs that may be holding the contagious fungi. Anti-fungal creams can be topically applied to the lesions, and in some cases, oral anti-fungal medications. Treatment can be long and difficult often taking 3-6 weeks to fully resolve a case, so it's best to be patient, follow doctor's orders and try to prevent contracting it altogether.

      Ringworm Prevention

      Since fungi are everywhere, prevention can be a challenge. Some animals can be carriers without showing signs of the infection and still transmit the fungi to others. The best route against ringworm prevention is to keep your pet clean and healthy – making sure he has a strong immune system. Keeping cats strictly indoors reduces their risks.

      Both you and your pet have well-designed systems to fight off illness and to battle it once its present. Starting with a strong defense system will lessen chances of illness for both you and your pet. Diet, stress and exercise play the biggest roles in determining whether pets get sick or stay healthy.

      If you suspect that you or your pet may have ringworm, contact your doctor or veterinarian immediately.

      –North Shore Animal League America
      Source:
      http://www.nsalamerica.org/pet_talk/dont-get-bugged-by-ringworm.html